Reliability and validity are two important concepts in research design that are often used to evaluate the quality of a study. Reliability refers to the consistency of a measure or procedure. A reliable measure is one that produces consistent results over time. For example, if a researcher were to measure a person’s height using a ruler, the ruler would be considered reliable if it consistently produces the same measurement each time it is used to measure the same person’s height. Validity refers to the accuracy of a measure or procedure. A valid measure is one that accurately reflects what it is intended to measure (Rose & Johnson, 2020). For example, if a researcher were to use a questionnaire to measure a person’s happiness, the questionnaire would be considered valid if it accurately reflects the person’s happiness. It is important for researchers to consider both reliability and validity when designing a study, as both are essential for producing accurate and reliable results. A study may be reliable but not valid, or valid but not reliable. It is generally considered best practice for a research study to be both reliable and valid.
This systematic review examines the effectiveness of alarming and alerting devices in reducing falls in long-term care (LTC) facilities. The authors of the review conducted a literature search to identify relevant studies that have been published on the topic. They found that while there are many perceptions against the use of alarming devices in LTC facilities, including that they are annoying, costly, and a waste of time for staff, there is also evidence showing the benefits of these devices. Alarming devices can be a key intervention in the safety of residents who are prone to falls, but their effectiveness depends on proper implementation and education for all parties involved, as well as proper oversight of their use (Mileski et al., 2019). The review also notes that new technology is changing the perceptions of these devices, and that education is a key component for staff, residents, and families in understanding their use.
In the case mentioned, the validity of the studies included in the review would depend on the quality of the individual studies and the measures used to assess the effectiveness of alarming and alerting devices in reducing falls in LTC facilities. The study shows that when they are used effectively, they help in reducing falls. The reliability of the studies would depend on the consistency of the results they obtained and whether they would produce the same results if they were repeated. Similar studies have also show that when alarms are used effectively falls are reduced. The research is therefore reliable and valid.
Mileski, M., Brooks, M., Topinka, J. B., Hamilton, G., Land, C., Mitchell, T., Mosley, B., & McClay, R. (2019). Alarming and/or alerting device effectiveness in reducing falls in long-term care (LTC) facilities? A systematic review. Healthcare, 7(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare7010051
Struggling with online classes or exams? Get expert help to ace your coursework, assignments, and tests stress-free!